> I think a prefix of ':' would be good, as it's already a
> standard, kinda. Anybody who names a database object :foo
> deserves whatever happens to them :P
>
I for one like something less cryptic than ':'
besids going with ':' means extra hack in gram.y
(Ones we get to implement packages I prefer to have "this.arg" and
"global.arg" than ':' and '::'
but I guess that's another discussion.)
Regards,
Gevik.
