Re: Call for port reports - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Dunstan
Subject Re: Call for port reports
Date
Msg-id 000b01c39c1e$c728d600$6401a8c0@DUNSLANE
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Call for port reports  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
List pgsql-hackers
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>
To: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>
Cc: <peter_e@gmx.net>; <pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 26, 2003 3:22 PM
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports


>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Dave Page
> > Sent: 26 October 2003 17:34
> > To: Bruce Momjian
> > Cc: peter_e@gmx.net; pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org
> > Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Call for port reports
> >
> >
> > > No problem --- the port is already marked as working --- this is a
> > > known problem with the parallel tests.
> >
> > No it's not, that's what I'm saying. Normally the tests
> > finish with a few failures (because Cygwin can't create
> > enough sockets). I'm seeing a full blown hang.
> >
>
> OK, cleaned up and rebuilt & it looks OK now (well, as OK as it ever
> does on XP Pro).
>

I am seeing these hangs consistently (but not always in the same place) on
XPHE running on a P4.

uname: CYGWIN_NT-5.1 DUNSLANE 1.5.5(0.94/3/2) 2003-09-20 16:31 i686 unknown
unknown Cygwin

cheers

andrew



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Jan Wieck
Date:
Subject: Re: Still a few flaws in configure's default CFLAGS selection
Next
From: Gaetano Mendola
Date:
Subject: BEGIN vs START TRANSACTION