Thanks, some useful stuff at http://techdocs.postgresql.org. I'd only found
the info given at http://www.ca.postgresql.org/interfaces.html , perhaps the
two should be more tightly cross-referenced.
The 'POSTGRESQL & ACCESS FAQ' solved a couple of problems I've been
experiencing. However, still draft version of FAQ so, a lot of stuff not
finished yet.
I did note that the link on the http://www.ca.postgresql.org/interfaces.html
page :
http://nsmsweb3.oucs.ox.ac.uk/pg/Pgsetup.html
Always gives me an 'access forbidden error', and the link on the
http://techdocs.postgresql.org page:
http://www.bcinternet.com/%7Ehilliard/postgresqlport.cfm
appears to be dead...
----- Original Message -----
From: "Justin Clift" <justin@postgresql.org>
To: "Steve O'Hagan" <sohagan@stanger.com.hk>
Cc: <pgsql-general@postgresql.org>
Sent: Tuesday, May 15, 2001 6:40 PM
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Re: Internet is putting lot of competition fire &
heat under Microsoft SQL Server
> Hi Steve,
>
> I don't know if you taken a look at them yet, but there are a number of
> Microsoft Access to PostgreSQL conversion documents linked to from the
> main page of the techdocs.postgresql.org website.
> (http://techdocs.postgresql.org)
>
> If they need improving, then let us know in which way, etc. :-)
>
> Regards and best wishes,
>
> Justin Clift
>
> Steve O'Hagan wrote:
> >
> > Seems little point in posting this to postgresql groups . . .preaching
to
> > the converted??? Perhaps you should post on a micro$oft or a general SQL
> > group?
> >
> > Oh, and how about a good guide for upsizing from M$ SQL and / or M$
ACCESS
> > to Postgresql - that'd be far more usefull ...
>
> --
> "My grandfather once told me that there are two kinds of people: those
> who work and those who take the credit. He told me to try to be in the
> first group; there was less competition there."
> - Indira Gandhi
