> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org [mailto:pgsql-hackers-owner@hub.org]On
> Behalf Of Zeugswetter Andreas SB
>
> > > > AFAIK,schema is independent from user in SQL92.
> > > > So default_tablespace_per_user doesn't necessarily imply
> > > > default_tablespace_per_schema.
> > >
> > > Well, sombody must be interpreting this wrong, because
> > > in Informix and Oracle the schema corresponds to the owner
> > > and they say they conform to ansi in this regard.
> >
> > Is there really a schema:user=1:1 limitation in SQL-92 ?
> > Though both SQL-86 and SQL-89 had the limitation
> > SQL-92 removed it AFAIK.
>
> As I said in another posting a user does not need to exist
> for each schema. The dba can create objects under any
> schema name.
>
Sorry for my poor understanding.
What I meant was that SQL92 allows the following.
schema owner---------------------------schema1 user1schema2 user1schema3 user2schema4 user3schema5
user3schema6 user3
Is my understaning same as yours ?
Regards.
Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp
