> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Fetter [mailto:david@fetter.org]=20
> Sent: 09 October 2005 18:20
> To: Tony Marston
> Cc: 'Tom Lane'; 'Jim C. Nasby'; pgsql-bugs@postgresql.org
> Subject: Re: [BUGS] BUG #1947: Enhancement Request - CONCAT() function
>=20
>=20
> On Sun, Oct 09, 2005 at 11:05:41AM +0100, Tony Marston wrote:
> >=20
> > > "Jim C. Nasby" <jnasby@pervasive.com> writes:
> > > > And you might want to make it a project at=20
> http://pgfoundry.org so=20
> > > > others can make use of it. You might also want to define it as=20
> > > > accepting an array; I think that would allow you to accept any=20
> > > > number of parameters.
> > >=20
> > > I think Tony is trying to avoid putting in any actual=20
> work ;-). To=20
> > > me, the sanest change would be to modify his app to use the=20
> > > SQL-standard syntax. Which surely is supported by those other=20
> > > databases too, no? And if not, why are *we* the ones=20
> getting the bug=20
> > > report?
> > >=20
> > > regards, tom lane
> >=20
> > You are getting this as a bug report for the simple reason=20
> that your=20
> > website does not seem to have a method of accepting enhancement=20
> > requests. That is why I specifically put ENHANCEMENT REQUEST in the=20
> > description.
>=20
> I've never seen somebody try so hard to get himself labeled=20
> as a help-rejecting complainer before. Are you *certain*=20
> that this is what you want to do, Tony?
I am just responding in kind. If you can't take it then don't dish it out in
the first place.
Tony Marston
http://www.tonymarston.net=20
