Re: int types migrated one level lower - Mailing list pgadmin-support

From Reshat Sabiq
Subject Re: int types migrated one level lower
Date
Msg-id 000001c2ace8$bcf22090$2e83d380@main
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: int types migrated one level lower  ("Dave Page" <dpage@vale-housing.co.uk>)
Responses Re: int types migrated one level lower  ("Reshat Sabiq" <sabiq@purdue.edu>)
List pgadmin-support
DP: Isn't there byte in pg? I know there is bytea (array of byte).

Yes, I've seen bytea, but it's 4+ bytes. I'm not aware of an 8-bit type.

DP: I don't have any intention of re-writing the migration wizard for
pgAdmin 3 at the moment. If I did, the type mapping would be definable
as it is now, but from ODBC types, not ADO.

I'd guess ODBC would be more reliable for Windows-based DBs, since ADO
apparently converts int8 into int4 and int4 into int2 (I don't think MS
Access considers long integer to be int4, and integer to be int2).

Thanks,
r.



pgadmin-support by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: int types migrated one level lower
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: pgAdminII 1.4.12 crash with PostgreSQL 7.3