Re: HELP < 63 users - Mailing list pgsql-cygwin

From joek hondius
Subject Re: HELP < 63 users
Date
Msg-id 000001c24f44$66fe7dc0$28884fc1@voyager
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: HELP < 63 users  (Jason Tishler <jason@tishler.net>)
Responses Re: HELP < 63 users
List pgsql-cygwin

>Joek,
>
>On Tue, Aug 27, 2002 at 04:45:49PM +0200, joek hondius wrote:
>> I could not find any pointer to this in the cygwin or postgresql docs
>> about this.  Jason Tishler noted this before in a review of why 'make
>> test' (parallel) failed (one year ago).
>
>I don't recall the above.  Please provide an URL.

Somehow i could not find the original postings anymore (they where there 3
weeks ago),
but thanks to google's cache:
http://www.google.nl/search?q=cache:CXMBRFwDZUwC:postgresql.linux.cz/mhonarc
/pgsql-ports/2001-03/msg00128.html+&hl=nl&ie=UTF-8

This is just some part of the discussion however.

>
>Are you referring to the following (from the README)?
>
>    1. make check can generate spurious regression test failures due to
>    overflowing the the listen() backlog queue which generates
>    connection refused errors.  Note that make installcheck does not
>    have this problem since it runs all tests sequentially instead of in
>    large concurrent groups.
>
>Jason

Of course i was referring to make check, not test (Ahum..),
But this is not a backlog problem.
Its seems to me to be a fork() to windows mapping problem. The
WaitForObject() winAPI call is limited to 63. So postgreSQL really seems
limited to 63 backends on cygwin. :(
I'm trying to get 200 concurrent users to work.

Joek


pgsql-cygwin by date:

Previous
From: Jason Tishler
Date:
Subject: Re: HELP < 63 users
Next
From: davedudd
Date:
Subject: µÚËÄ´ú¸ßËÙ·þÎñÆ÷!!!È«¹ú×îµ×¼Û¸ñµÄÓòÃûÖ÷»ú!!!¹ú¼ÊÓòÃûÖ»Ðè80Ôª!!!!