RE: Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject RE: Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
Date
Msg-id 000001c0fb2e$f12b7b80$0201a8c0@INSPIRON
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]  (Michael Stephenson <mstephenson@tirin.openworld.co.uk>)
List pgsql-jdbc
Yes, this is the correct approach, great advice!

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Michael Stephenson
Sent: June 22, 2001 10:42 AM
To: PostgreSQL jdbc list
Subject: [JDBC] Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]

[snip]

Wouldn't it be more elegant simply to make the ThreadLocal's static (as
I'd have thought was probably the intention of the original author),
this
would remove the possiblity of any memory leaks in a single threaded
environment, and have the same affect ultimately in a multithreaded
environment?

Michael Stephenson


---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives?

http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Tony Grant
Date:
Subject: Re: Connection Pooling?
Next
From: OreoMitch
Date:
Subject: Multi return values for Stored Procs