RE: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] - Mailing list pgsql-jdbc

From Dave Cramer
Subject RE: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
Date
Msg-id 000001c0fb28$65546ff0$0201a8c0@INSPIRON
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]  ("Rainer Mager" <rmager@vgkk.com>)
List pgsql-jdbc
I am going to have a look at the spec in more detail to see how they
expect the driver to be used within threads

I am in a similar situation wrt using the driver in server and will
check if the memory usage is better.

Dave

-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-jdbc-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Rainer Mager
Sent: June 22, 2001 12:56 AM
To: Dave Cramer; Bruce Momjian
Cc: PostgreSQL jdbc list
Subject: RE: [JDBC] Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]

Good questions, I'll answer what I can...

> 1) what is the problem that this is trying to solve, I assume from the
> subject that it is some sort of high memory usage?

Yes it involves memory usage and a memory leak. Basically, the way the
code
was before the patch, each instantiation of a PreparedStatement created
2
new ThreadLocal objects. According to Sun's Javadocs, these objects are
not
freed until the thread is completed. For a single thread app or main
thread
of an application (in our case a server) the thread NEVER goes away.
Therefore these ThreadLocal objects just keep adding up and using
memory,
forever.

The patch removes the use of these ThreadLocals.


> 2) I am trying to understand how a statement would ever be used
> by more than
> one thread at a time? I would think that it would be impossible to
share
> statements across threads.

This I can't really answer. The code appeared to be written to be thread
safe so I attempted to continue that. Whether thread safe for a
Statement is
necessary or not I can't directly say. Although, I agree with you, I
can't
imagine a need to use a single Statement in multiple threads.


> 3) The double locking method used is alledgedly unsafe on SMP machines
> http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-02-2001/jw-0209-double_p.html.

Interesting. I wasn't aware of this. If question #2 is answered such
that
thread safe isn't necessary, then this problem goes away pretty easily.
If
thread safety is needed then this would have to be rewritten, I can look
into doing this if you like.


> Dave

--Rainer



---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command
    (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to majordomo@postgresql.org)



pgsql-jdbc by date:

Previous
From: Michael Stephenson
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]
Next
From: "Dave Cramer"
Date:
Subject: RE: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]