Re: design help for performance - Mailing list pgsql-general

From Misa Simic
Subject Re: design help for performance
Date
Msg-id -5599416687877757762@unknownmsgid
Whole thread Raw
In response to design help for performance  (Culley Harrelson <harrelson@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: design help for performance  ("David Johnston" <polobo@yahoo.com>)
List pgsql-general
Hi Culley,

Have you tried to create fk together with index on fk column on table B?

What are results? Would be good if you could send the query and explain
analyze...

Sent from my Windows Phone
------------------------------
From: Culley Harrelson
Sent: 21 December 2011 00:57
To: pgsql-general@postgresql.org
Subject: [GENERAL] design help for performance

I am bumping into some performance issues and am seeking help.

I have two tables A and B in a one (A) to many (B) relationship.  There are
1.4 million records in table A and 44 million records in table B.  In my
web application any request for a record from table A is also going to need
a count of associated records in table B.  Several years ago I added
table_b_rowcount to table A in order to minimize queries on table B.  And
now, as the application has grown, I am starting to having locking problems
on table A.  Any change to table B requires the that table_b_rowcount be
updated on table A...  The application has outgrown this solution.

So... is there a common solution to this problem?

culley

pgsql-general by date:

Previous
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL server architecture
Next
From: John R Pierce
Date:
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL server architecture