"
I am able to write array_to_json fce and Andrew can write query_to_json"
+1
Thanks guys...
We are using a lot of JSON as communication protocol...
having core support for JSON, And those functions, will be a real life
saver...
Many thanks,
Misa
Sent from my Windows Phone
From: Pavel Stehule
Sent: 11/01/2012 16:22
To: Robert Haas
Cc: David E. Wheeler; Claes Jakobsson; Dimitri Fontaine; Merlin
Moncure; Andrew Dunstan; Magnus Hagander; Jan Urba=C5=84ski; Simon Riggs;
Joey Adams; Bruce Momjian; PostgreSQL-development Hackers; Jan Wieck
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] JSON for PG 9.2
2012/1/11 Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>:
> On Wed, Jan 11, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>> I understand it now. My opinion is so some operators and index search
>> can be in 9.2 - so use a JSON just as communication format now.
>>
>> * we need to build JSON
>> * we need to check if some is valid JSON
>> * we need to store JSON
>>
>> other steps should be (9.2)
>> * basic operators eq, neeq
>> * some tool like XQuery - simple query on JSON document available from
>> SQL that can be used for functional indexes.
>
> That would be nice, but let's not let the perfect be the enemy of the
> good. =C2=A0We don't have a lot of time here.
>
sorry - replace 9.2 by 9.3 - I am sorry
I am able to write array_to_json fce and Andrew can write query_to_json
Pavel
> --
> Robert Haas
> EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
> The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--=20
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
