Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c
Date
Msg-id -448198598857690804@unknownmsgid
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Apr 2, 2010, at 6:07 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
>> b) The tag isn't actually version-stamped.  configure/configure.in
>> still
>> say 9.0devel.
>
> Sure, because the tag is on a branch.  According to the commit message
> that went by, Robert did that correctly:
>
> http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-committers/2010-03/msg00378.php

I just took the patch Peter applied for alpha4 and ran it through sed,
applied the result, and sanity it.

...Robert

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Compile fail, alpha5 & gcc 4.3.3 in elog.c
Next
From: junaidmalik14
Date:
Subject: count function alternative in postgres