Chapter 65. Generic WAL Records
Although all built-in WAL-logged modules have their own types of WAL records, there is also a generic WAL record type, which describes changes to pages in a generic way. This is useful for extensions that provide custom access methods.
In comparison with Custom WAL Resource Managers, Generic WAL is simpler for an extension to implement and does not require the extension library to be loaded in order to apply the records.
Note
Generic WAL records are ignored during Logical Decoding. If logical decoding is required for your extension, consider a Custom WAL Resource Manager.
The API for constructing generic WAL records is defined in access/generic_xlog.h and implemented in access/transam/generic_xlog.c.
To perform a WAL-logged data update using the generic WAL record facility, follow these steps:
state = GenericXLogStart(relation)— start construction of a generic WAL record for the given relation.page = GenericXLogRegisterBuffer(state, buffer, flags)— register a buffer to be modified within the current generic WAL record. This function returns a pointer to a temporary copy of the buffer's page, where modifications should be made. (Do not modify the buffer's contents directly.) The third argument is a bit mask of flags applicable to the operation. Currently the only such flag isGENERIC_XLOG_FULL_IMAGE, which indicates that a full-page image rather than a delta update should be included in the WAL record. Typically this flag would be set if the page is new or has been rewritten completely.GenericXLogRegisterBuffercan be repeated if the WAL-logged action needs to modify multiple pages.Apply modifications to the page images obtained in the previous step.
GenericXLogFinish(state)— apply the changes to the buffers and emit the generic WAL record.
WAL record construction can be canceled between any of the above steps by calling GenericXLogAbort(state). This will discard all changes to the page image copies.
Please note the following points when using the generic WAL record facility:
No direct modifications of buffers are allowed! All modifications must be done in copies acquired from
GenericXLogRegisterBuffer(). In other words, code that makes generic WAL records should never callBufferGetPage()for itself. However, it remains the caller's responsibility to pin/unpin and lock/unlock the buffers at appropriate times. Exclusive lock must be held on each target buffer from beforeGenericXLogRegisterBuffer()until afterGenericXLogFinish().Registrations of buffers (step 2) and modifications of page images (step 3) can be mixed freely, i.e., both steps may be repeated in any sequence. Keep in mind that buffers should be registered in the same order in which locks are to be obtained on them during replay.
The maximum number of buffers that can be registered for a generic WAL record is
MAX_GENERIC_XLOG_PAGES. An error will be thrown if this limit is exceeded.Generic WAL assumes that the pages to be modified have standard layout, and in particular that there is no useful data between
pd_lowerandpd_upper.Since you are modifying copies of buffer pages,
GenericXLogStart()does not start a critical section. Thus, you can safely do memory allocation, error throwing, etc. betweenGenericXLogStart()andGenericXLogFinish(). The only actual critical section is present insideGenericXLogFinish(). There is no need to worry about callingGenericXLogAbort()during an error exit, either.GenericXLogFinish()takes care of marking buffers dirty and setting their LSNs. You do not need to do this explicitly.For unlogged relations, everything works the same except that no actual WAL record is emitted. Thus, you typically do not need to do any explicit checks for unlogged relations.
The generic WAL redo function will acquire exclusive locks to buffers in the same order as they were registered. After redoing all changes, the locks will be released in the same order.
If
GENERIC_XLOG_FULL_IMAGEis not specified for a registered buffer, the generic WAL record contains a delta between the old and the new page images. This delta is based on byte-by-byte comparison. This is not very compact for the case of moving data within a page, and might be improved in the future.