From 7a3524600fa589565b0cc4b5f00196d60213dff6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Kyotaro Horiguchi Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2026 13:48:25 +0900 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] Add omitted "that" for clarity in some messages MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit This patch inserts “that” in several message where it had been omitted, improving readability and reducing ambiguity. --- src/backend/partitioning/partbounds.c | 12 ++++++------ 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/partitioning/partbounds.c b/src/backend/partitioning/partbounds.c index a4487521a67..be3a3dc80f0 100644 --- a/src/backend/partitioning/partbounds.c +++ b/src/backend/partitioning/partbounds.c @@ -5406,7 +5406,7 @@ check_partition_bounds_for_split_range(Relation parent, errmsg("lower bound of partition \"%s\" is not equal to lower bound of split partition \"%s\"", relname, get_rel_name(splitPartOid)), - errhint("%s requires combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", + errhint("%s requires that combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", "ALTER TABLE ... SPLIT PARTITION"), parser_errposition(pstate, exprLocation((Node *) datum))); } @@ -5416,7 +5416,7 @@ check_partition_bounds_for_split_range(Relation parent, errmsg("lower bound of partition \"%s\" is less than lower bound of split partition \"%s\"", relname, get_rel_name(splitPartOid)), - errhint("%s requires combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", + errhint("%s requires that combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", "ALTER TABLE ... SPLIT PARTITION"), parser_errposition(pstate, exprLocation((Node *) datum))); } @@ -5448,7 +5448,7 @@ check_partition_bounds_for_split_range(Relation parent, errmsg("upper bound of partition \"%s\" is not equal to upper bound of split partition \"%s\"", relname, get_rel_name(splitPartOid)), - errhint("%s requires combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", + errhint("%s requires that combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", "ALTER TABLE ... SPLIT PARTITION"), parser_errposition(pstate, exprLocation((Node *) datum))); } @@ -5458,7 +5458,7 @@ check_partition_bounds_for_split_range(Relation parent, errmsg("upper bound of partition \"%s\" is greater than upper bound of split partition \"%s\"", relname, get_rel_name(splitPartOid)), - errhint("%s requires combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", + errhint("%s requires that combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", "ALTER TABLE ... SPLIT PARTITION"), parser_errposition(pstate, exprLocation((Node *) datum))); } @@ -5654,7 +5654,7 @@ check_parent_values_in_new_partitions(Relation parent, errmsg("new partitions combined partition bounds do not contain value (%s) but split partition \"%s\" does", "NULL", get_rel_name(partOid)), - errhint("%s requires combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", + errhint("%s requires that combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", "ALTER TABLE ... SPLIT PARTITION")); /* @@ -5697,7 +5697,7 @@ check_parent_values_in_new_partitions(Relation parent, errmsg("new partitions combined partition bounds do not contain value (%s) but split partition \"%s\" does", deparse_expression((Node *) notFoundVal, NIL, false, false), get_rel_name(partOid)), - errhint("%s requires combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", + errhint("%s requires that combined bounds of new partitions must exactly match the bound of the split partition", "ALTER TABLE ... SPLIT PARTITION")); } } -- 2.47.3