From 9c0b32253cc537225fb0c89304c4f49162219226 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Chao Li (Evan)" Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2025 07:49:05 +0800 Subject: [PATCH v1] Fix duplicated word in lsyscache.c comment MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Remove a duplicated “Otherwise” in the comment describing equality_ops_are_compatible() in lsyscache.c, improving readability without changing meaning or behavior. No functional change intended. Author: Chao Li --- src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c b/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c index 5aa7a26d95c..9be36583835 100644 --- a/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c +++ b/src/backend/utils/cache/lsyscache.c @@ -768,9 +768,9 @@ get_op_index_interpretation(Oid opno) * semantics. * * This is trivially true if they are the same operator. Otherwise, - * Otherwise, we look to see if they both belong to an opfamily that - * guarantees compatible semantics for equality. Either finding allows us to - * assume that they have compatible notions of equality. (The reason we need + * we look to see if they both belong to an opfamily that guarantees + * compatible semantics for equality. Either finding allows us to assume + * that they have compatible notions of equality. (The reason we need * to do these pushups is that one might be a cross-type operator; for * instance int24eq vs int4eq.) */ -- 2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)