From 890160b2760ac348af5edae7e6af07318b7fb20e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Robert Haas Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2024 11:48:58 -0500 Subject: [PATCH v1] Revise pg_walsummary's 002_blocks test to avoid spurious failures. Analysis of buildfarm results showed that the code that was intended to wait for the inserts performed by this test to complete did not actually do so. Try to make that logic more robust. Improve error checking elsewhere in the script, too, so that we don't miss things like poll_query_until failing. --- src/bin/pg_walsummary/t/002_blocks.pl | 47 ++++++++++++++++----------- 1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/bin/pg_walsummary/t/002_blocks.pl b/src/bin/pg_walsummary/t/002_blocks.pl index 40908da8cb..eb128f460c 100644 --- a/src/bin/pg_walsummary/t/002_blocks.pl +++ b/src/bin/pg_walsummary/t/002_blocks.pl @@ -13,13 +13,6 @@ $node1->init(has_archiving => 1, allows_streaming => 1); $node1->append_conf('postgresql.conf', 'summarize_wal = on'); $node1->start; -# See what's been summarized up until now. -my $progress = $node1->safe_psql('postgres', <safe_psql('postgres', <safe_psql('postgres', <poll_query_until('postgres', <poll_query_until('postgres', < '$summarized_lsn' + WHERE end_lsn >= '$base_lsn' ) EOM +ok($result, "WAL summarization caught up after insert"); -# Again check the progress of WAL summarization. -$progress = $node1->safe_psql('postgres', <safe_psql('postgres', <poll_query_until('postgres', <poll_query_until('postgres', < '$summarized_lsn' ) EOM +ok($result, "got new WAL summary after update"); # Figure out the exact details for the new summary file. my $details = $node1->safe_psql('postgres', < '$summarized_lsn' EOM -my ($tli, $start_lsn, $end_lsn) = split(/\|/, $details); +my @lines = split(/\n/, $details); +is(0+@lines, 1, "got exactly one new WAL summary"); +my ($tli, $start_lsn, $end_lsn) = split(/\|/, $lines[0]); note("examining summary for TLI $tli from $start_lsn to $end_lsn"); note_wal_summary_dir("after new summary", $node1); @@ -81,12 +88,14 @@ my $filename = sprintf "%s/pg_wal/summaries/%08s%08s%08s%08s%08s.summary", ok(-f $filename, "WAL summary file exists"); note_wal_summary_dir("after existence check", $node1); -# Run pg_walsummary on it. We expect block 0 to be modified, but depending -# on where the new tuple ends up, block 1 might also be modified, so we -# pass -i to pg_walsummary to make sure we don't end up with a 0..1 range. +# Run pg_walsummary on it. We expect exactly two blocks to be modified, +# block 0 and one other. my ($stdout, $stderr) = run_command([ 'pg_walsummary', '-i', $filename ]); +note($stdout); +@lines = split(/\n/, $stdout); like($stdout, qr/FORK main: block 0$/m, "stdout shows block 0 modified"); is($stderr, '', 'stderr is empty'); +is(0+@lines, 2, "UPDATE modified 2 blocks"); note_wal_summary_dir("after pg_walsummary run", $node1); done_testing(); -- 2.39.3 (Apple Git-145)