Re: SPI bug. - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew - Supernews
Subject Re: SPI bug.
Date
Msg-id slrnd79jhj.2da6.andrew+nonews@trinity.supernews.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to SPI bug.  (Tzahi Fadida <tzahi_ml@myrealbox.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2005-05-01, Neil Conway <neilc@samurai.com> wrote:
> Tzahi Fadida wrote:
>> I think the solution can be either changing the FETCH_ALL to
>> INT_MAX or changing the interface parameter count and subsequent usages
>> to long.
>
> I think changing SPI_cursor_fetch() and SPI_cursor_move() to take a 
> "long" for the "count" parameter is the right fix for HEAD. It would 
> probably not be wise to backport, though, as it is probably not worth 
> breaking ABI compatibility for SPI during a stable release series.

While you're at it, how about a way to specify WITH SCROLL for a cursor
created in SPI? At the moment, SPI_cursor_open hardwires the scroll option
according to the result of ExecSupportsBackwardScan.

-- 
Andrew, Supernews
http://www.supernews.com - individual and corporate NNTP services


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: Re: Feature freeze date for 8.1
Next
From: Thomas Hallgren
Date:
Subject: Re: SPI bug.