[OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?) - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Lew
Subject [OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?)
Date
Msg-id ir65ud$co1$1@news.albasani.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: SORT performance - slow?  ("Kevin Grittner" <Kevin.Grittner@wicourts.gov>)
Responses Re: [OT]: Confidentiality disclosures in list posts (Was: SORT performance - slow?)  (Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>)
List pgsql-performance
Kevin Grittner wrote:
> "Strange, John W"  wrote:
>> If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
>> that any disclosure, copying, distribution, or use of the
>> information contained herein (including any reliance thereon) is
>> STRICTLY PROHIBITED.
>
> You probably already know this, but just to make sure -- you posted
> this to a public list which is automatically replicated to several
> websites freely available to everyone on the planet.

It's irrelevant, since that "STRICTLY PROHIBITED" verbiage is irrelevant,
unenforceable and legally meaningless.  I could post that message on my
personal blog, being not the intended recipient myself, and they would b e
utterly powerless to do anything about it even if they sent it privately to my
personal email inbox.

I don't even know why people bother even putting such nonsense into their
emails, let alone Usenet or mailing-list posts.

--
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From:
Date:
Subject: FW: KVP table vs. hstore - hstore performance (Was: Postgres NoSQL emulation)
Next
From: Aren Cambre
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres refusing to use >1 core