Re: [PATCH] Using pread instead of lseek (with analysis) - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Qingqing Zhou
Subject Re: [PATCH] Using pread instead of lseek (with analysis)
Date
Msg-id di98cc$29i4$1@news.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to [PATCH] Using pread instead of lseek (with analysis)  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-patches
"Martijn van Oosterhout" <kleptog@svana.org> wrote
>
> Below is a patch that tries to determine (for linux) if the pread is
> emulated or not (using an autoconf test), and if so use it instead of
> lseek.

Just FYI, this was proposed 2 years ago:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-patches/2003-02/msg00197.php

The basic problem I read from the above thread is that it does not give
enough performance proofs on *various* platforms.

Regards,
Qingqing



pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos brokenness and oops question in 8.1beta2
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Kerberos brokenness and oops question in 8.1beta2