+1 to seamless partitioning.
Although the idea of having a student work on this seems a bit scary, but what seems scary to me may be a piece of cake
fora talented kid :-)
Kiriakos
http://www.mockbites.com
On Mar 13, 2012, at 3:07 PM, John R Pierce wrote:
> On 03/08/12 12:01 PM, Andy Colson wrote:
>>
>> 2) better partitioning support. Something much more automatic.
>
> that would be really high on our list. and something that can handle adding/dropping partitions while there's
concurrenttransactions involving the partitioned table
>
> also a planner that can cope with optimizing prepared statements where the partitioning variable is a passed
parameter.