I have a 3.4.3 RT using PG quite happily.
LER
--
Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler
Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: ler@lerctr.org
US Mail: 3535 Gaspar Drive, Dallas, TX 75220-3611 US
-----Original Message-----
From: pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org
[mailto:pgsql-advocacy-owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Roderick A.
Anderson
Sent: Thursday, September 08, 2005 10:51 PM
To: Pg Advocacy
Subject: [pgsql-advocacy] Request Tracker ( RT ) recommends MySQL
I've been away from the site and mailing list for better than a year so was
surprised as all get out that MySQL is ther recommended database for RT. The
version I installed over four years ago uses Pg.
My question is does anyone know why they decided to go with MySQL? ( Pg
7.3 or above is an alternative; as is Oracle ). I would ask the RT list but
don't want to get into any flaming combats and was hoping someone here might
know ( having risked being charred. )
Thanks,
Rod
--
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 2: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster