Re: Delete, foreign key, index usage - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Johann Spies
Subject Re: Delete, foreign key, index usage
Date
Msg-id CAGZ55DRr=wVHJgfrBb9eGVWyL81ObJw=7kpfxpfYyeS4osTKmw@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Delete, foreign key, index usage  (Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Delete, foreign key, index usage
List pgsql-performance
On 4 April 2017 at 14:07, Johann Spies <johann.spies@gmail.com> wrote:

> Why would that be?

To answer my own question.  After experimenting a lot we found that
9.6 uses a parallel seqscan that is actually a lot faster than using
the index on these large tables.

This, to us was a surprise!

Regards
Johann

--
Because experiencing your loyal love is better than life itself,
my lips will praise you.  (Psalm 63:3)


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Johann Spies
Date:
Subject: Delete, foreign key, index usage
Next
From: Rick Otten
Date:
Subject: Re: Delete, foreign key, index usage