Re: A not so good comparison of MVCC implementations - Mailing list pgsql-advocacy

From Robert Haas
Subject Re: A not so good comparison of MVCC implementations
Date
Msg-id CA+TgmobEJVW_1A-gXU89u1nNcwBfvLq24rcA1zLkq3hNbiFkqA@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A not so good comparison of MVCC implementations  ("Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>)
Responses Re: A not so good comparison of MVCC implementations
List pgsql-advocacy
On Fri, Jan 26, 2018 at 2:07 PM, Jonathan S. Katz <jkatz@postgresql.org> wrote:
>> Yeah, that's really deceptive.
>
> Skimming the paper, it also does not mention which versions of the software
> are being used.  Ideally how the DBs were configured on the hardware
> would be great to see too, but that may be asking too much.

That's because they didn't use *any* version of PostgreSQL.  They
tested something that they claim works *like* PostgreSQL but is
actually not the PostgreSQL code.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


pgsql-advocacy by date:

Previous
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: A not so good comparison of MVCC implementations
Next
From: "Jonathan S. Katz"
Date:
Subject: Re: A not so good comparison of MVCC implementations