Re: [ADMIN] build from Source: 9.0.1 / 9.1-alpha1 cannot build modules - Mailing list pgsql-testers

From Lou Picciano
Subject Re: [ADMIN] build from Source: 9.0.1 / 9.1-alpha1 cannot build modules
Date
Msg-id 947620539.10271.1286730846057.JavaMail.root@sz0093a.westchester.pa.mail.comcast.net
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: Re: [ADMIN] build from Source: 9.0.1 / 9.1-alpha1 cannot build modules  (Josh Berkus <josh@agliodbs.com>)
List pgsql-testers
Yes, that's the line.  Have even edited to be sure it's got a proper CR, etc.

No, haven't even touched on vpath yet...  Happy to try - what to test?  

What to check for in Makefile.global.in?  Looks pretty good in cursory overview.

Time to move to SunStudio?  Better binary performance?

Regards, Lou Picciano

----- Original Message -----
From: "Tom Lane" <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
To: "Lou Picciano" <loupicciano@comcast.net>
Cc: "pgsql-testers" <pgsql-testers@postgresql.org>, "pgsql-admin" <pgsql-admin@postgresql.org>
Sent: Sunday, October 10, 2010 12:53:26 PM
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] build from Source: 9.0.1 / 9.1-alpha1 cannot build modules

Lou Picciano <loupicciano@comcast.net> writes:
> 'Wacko', indeed, no?
> It's make 3.81, as packaged with OpenIndiana. gcc is 3.4.3.

Hm, 3.81 is a pretty popular version, so that doesn't seem to be the
answer.  Did you look at exactly what was on the complained-of line?
It looks to me like it should be

        top_srcdir = $(top_builddir)

which seems unobjectionable.  But maybe there's something wrong
with your copy of Makefile.global.in.

BTW, was this a vpath build, or not?

                        regards, tom lane

pgsql-testers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] build from Source: 9.0.1 / 9.1-alpha1 cannot build modules
Next
From: Josh Berkus
Date:
Subject: Re: Re: [ADMIN] build from Source: 9.0.1 / 9.1-alpha1 cannot build modules