Re: Lock compatibility matrix - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Date
Msg-id 9240.1170189097@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Lock compatibility matrix  ("Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com>)
Responses Re: Lock compatibility matrix  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-patches
"Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> On Tue, 2007-01-30 at 11:09 +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> Why would we want to have two redundant copies of the same information?

> The lock information is not available anywhere in the form of a matrix.

Sure, but at this point we have proposals for adding two different matrix
representations, both redundant with the textual description.  I don't
mind adding one of the two, but both seems overkill.

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Simon Riggs"
Date:
Subject: Re: Lock compatibility matrix
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: Lock compatibility matrix