Re: Autoconf test for incompatible version of flex - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Greg Stark
Subject Re: Autoconf test for incompatible version of flex
Date
Msg-id 87vfug2rx7.fsf@stark.dyndns.tv
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Autoconf test for incompatible version of flex  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> writes:

> Greg Stark <gsstark@mit.edu> writes:
> > I inquired about this problem elsewhere, it's not a bug, it's an API change.
> > Until postgres "ports" to the new API it won't work with newer versions of
> > Flex.
>
> If their intent was to break things, why wasn't this called flex 3.0?
> Or at least 2.6?  Calling it a minor version bump has to violate a
> truth-in-advertising law or two.

Or something else like "glex", since it doesn't really look much like flex any
more... I don't know whether it will be possible to port to the new API and
still have postgresql compile with the old API.

Incidentally, for anyone else compiling on debian there's a flex-old package.
I can't install it because of some other dependencies, so i just reverted to
the old flex.

--
greg

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Another POC initdb patch
Next
From: Bruno Wolff III
Date:
Subject: Re: Proof-of-concept for initdb-time shared_buffers selection