Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes: > I looked over this item, originally posted as: > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-03/msg01055.php I still think this is substantial complication (more than likely introducing some bugs) to deal with a non problem. http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2005-03/msg01058.php regards, tom lane
pgsql-patches by date:
Соглашаюсь с условиями обработки персональных данных