Brendan Jurd wrote:
> Why *does* Slony require a bi-directional connection to the
> subscriber? The data is travelling in one direction only ... what
> needs to come back the other way?
So the slave can say "yes I got that data you can remove it from my TODO
list" ?
> This seems to be getting rather messy. I wonder if I might not be
> better off just writing AFTER triggers on all the tables I'm
> interested in, which replicate the query to the slave system with
> psql. It would probably be relatively labour intensive, and increase
> the burden of administering the schema, but it would also be a much
> more direct and simple approach.
>
That sounds like contrib/dbmirror
--
Shane Ambler
pgSQL@007Marketing.com
Get Sheeky @ http://Sheeky.Biz