Re: High Planning Time - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: High Planning Time
Date
Msg-id 403.1453473301@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: High Planning Time  (Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>)
List pgsql-performance
Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at> writes:
> Phil S wrote:
>> explain analyze
>> select * from message
>> limit 1
>>
>> "Limit  (cost=0.00..0.44 rows=1 width=1517) (actual time=0.009..0.009 rows=1 loops=1)"
>> "  ->  Seq Scan on message  (cost=0.00..28205.48 rows=64448 width=1517) (actual time=0.007..0.007
>> rows=1 loops=1)"
>> "Planning time: 3667.361 ms"
>> "Execution time: 1.652 ms"
>>
>> As you can see the query is simple and does not justify 3 seconds of planning time. It would appear
>> that there is an issue with my configuration but I am not able to find anything that looks out of
>> sorts in the query planning configuration variables. Any advice about what I should be looking for to
>> fix this would be appreciated.

> This is odd.
> Could you profile the backend during such a statement to see where the time is spent?


I'm wondering about locks.  Perhaps turning on log_lock_waits would
yield useful info.

            regards, tom lane


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Vitalii Tymchyshyn
Date:
Subject: Re: High Planning Time
Next
From: Jim Nasby
Date:
Subject: Re: insert performance