Re: Thousands of tables versus on table? - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Jonah H. Harris
Subject Re: Thousands of tables versus on table?
Date
Msg-id 36e682920706061240m4855a18ava914ab072984a256@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Thousands of tables versus on table?  (Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca>)
List pgsql-performance
On 6/6/07, Andrew Sullivan <ajs@crankycanuck.ca> wrote:
> Well, you will always have to deal with the sort of people who will
> base their technical prescriptions on the shiny ads they read in
> SuperGlobalNetworkedExecutiveGoFast, or whatever rag they're reading
> these days.

Always.

> I usually encourage such people actually to perform the
> analysis of the license, salary, contingency, and migrations costs

Yes, this is the best way.

--
Jonah H. Harris, Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324
EnterpriseDB Corporation            | fax: 732.331.1301
33 Wood Ave S, 3rd Floor            | jharris@enterprisedb.com
Iselin, New Jersey 08830            | http://www.enterprisedb.com/

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: Re: Thousands of tables versus on table?
Next
From: Andrew Sullivan
Date:
Subject: control of benchmarks (was: Thousands of tables)