Re: Partial aggregates pushdown - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
Date
Msg-id 3278991.1680918900@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Partial aggregates pushdown  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Responses Re: Partial aggregates pushdown
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> writes:
> What I don't want is an error-prone setup where administrators have to
> remember what the per-server settings are.  Based on your suggestion,
> let's allow CREATE SERVER to have an option 'enable_async_aggregate' (is
> that the right name?), which defaults to 'true' for _all_ servers, even
> those that don't support async aggregates.

Uh, what?  Why would we not be able to tell from the remote server's
version number whether it has this ability?

            regards, tom lane



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: daitch_mokotoff module
Next
From: Stephen Frost
Date:
Subject: Re: Kerberos delegation support in libpq and postgres_fdw