Postgres Professional
   

Re: GiST index performance

From: Tom Lane
Subject: Re: GiST index performance
Date: ,
Msg-id: 28986.1241647652@sss.pgh.pa.us
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling)
Responses: Re: GiST index performance  (Oleg Bartunov)
List: pgsql-performance

Tree view

GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
 Re: GiST index performance  ("Kevin Grittner", )
  Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
  Re: GiST index performance  (Tom Lane, )
   Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
    Re: GiST index performance  (Tom Lane, )
     Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
   Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
    Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
     Re: GiST index performance  (Tom Lane, )
 Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
 Re: GiST index performance  (dforum, )
  Re: GiST index performance  (Tom Lane, )
  Re: GiST index performance  (Craig Ringer, )
 Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
  Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
   Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
    Re: GiST index performance  (Tom Lane, )
     Re: GiST index performance  (Oleg Bartunov, )
 Re: GiST index performance  (Matthew Wakeling, )
  Re: GiST index performance  (Bruce Momjian, )
   Re: GiST index performance  (Robert Haas, )
    Re: GiST index performance  (Bruce Momjian, ) 
Matthew Wakeling <> writes:
> Here is my patch ported over to the seg contrib package, attached. Apply
> it to seg.c and all should be well. A similar thing needs to be done to
> cube, but I haven't looked at that.

Teodor, Oleg, do you intend to review/apply this patch?

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous:
From: Craig Ringer
Date:
Subject: Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG?
Next:
From: Dimitri
Date:
Subject: Re: Any better plan for this query?..