Re: Current CVS parallel test lock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Current CVS parallel test lock
Date
Msg-id 23369.1110378141@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Current CVS parallel test lock  (Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org>)
Responses Re: Current CVS parallel test lock  (Christopher Kings-Lynne <chriskl@familyhealth.com.au>)
List pgsql-hackers
Michael Fuhr <mike@fuhr.org> writes:
> Do you have a way to revert to the old installation to check whether
> the checks fail again?  It might be useful to track down exactly
> what happened.  It seems wrong that a currently-installed version
> should have adverse effects on a just-built version's regression
> tests.

We've seen that happen many times with shared library dependencies
... but libpq hasn't changed in the last few days AFAIR.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Nicolai Tufar
Date:
Subject: Re: [pgsql-hackers-win32] snprintf causes regression tests to fail
Next
From: Christopher Kings-Lynne
Date:
Subject: Re: Current CVS parallel test lock