Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Kenneth Marshall
Subject Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows
Date
Msg-id 20101207201028.GE4028@aart.is.rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Richard Broersma <richard.broersma@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows  (Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>)
List pgsql-performance
On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 11:56:51AM -0800, Richard Broersma wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 11:43 AM, Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net> wrote:
>
> > In PG the first statement you fire off (like an "insert into" for example)
> > will start a transaction. ?If you dont commit before you disconnect that
> > transaction will be rolled back. ?Even worse, if your program does not
> > commit, but keeps the connection to the db open, the transaction will stay
> > open too.
>
> Huh - is this new?  I always thought that every statement was wrapped
> in its own transaction unless you explicitly start your own.  So you
> shouldn't need to commit before closing a connection if you never
> opened a transaction to begin with.
>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Richard Broersma Jr.
>

The default of autocommit unless explicitly starting a transaction with
BEGIN is the normal behavior that I have seen as well.

Cheers,
Ken

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Richard Broersma
Date:
Subject: Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows
Next
From: Gary Doades
Date:
Subject: Re: Compared MS SQL 2000 to Postgresql 9.0 on Windows