Re: autovacuum hung?

From: Alvaro Herrera
Subject: Re: autovacuum hung?
Date: ,
Msg-id: 20090530000239.GG10092@alvh.no-ip.org
(view: Whole thread, Raw)
In response to: autovacuum hung?  (Brian Cox)
List: pgsql-performance

Tree view

autovacuum hung?  (Brian Cox, )
 Re: autovacuum hung?  (Alvaro Herrera, )
 Re: autovacuum hung?  (Brian Cox, )
 Re: autovacuum hung?  (Tom Lane, )
 Re: autovacuum hung?  (Brian Cox, )
  Re: autovacuum hung?  (Tom Lane, )
 Re: autovacuum hung?  (Brian Cox, )
  Re: autovacuum hung?  (Tom Lane, )
 Re: autovacuum hung?  (Brian Cox, )
  Re: autovacuum hung?  (Tom Lane, )
  Re: autovacuum hung?  (Tom Lane, )
 Re: autovacuum hung?  (Brian Cox, )

Brian Cox wrote:
> autovacuum has been running on 2 tables for > 5 hours. There tables are
> not huge (see below). For the past ~1 hour, I've shut off all other
> activity on this database. The other table being vacuumed has more rows
> (1897810). Anyone have any ideas about why this is taking so long?

What's vacuum_cost_delay?

--
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-performance by date:

From: Scott Carey
Date:
Subject: Re: Scalability in postgres
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: autovacuum hung?