Magnus Hagander wrote:
> > >>> This was not ready to be applied, was it?
> >
> > > I don't recall any specific objections that weren't answered.
> >
> > How about the fact that it's already caused one buildfarm failure?
> >
> > http://www.pgbuildfarm.org/cgi-bin/show_log.pl?nm=wasp&dt=2006
> -04-30%2003:05:01
>
>
> Well, that objection certainly wasn't raised before since it wasn't on
> buildfarm, and it passed the regression tests many times on my systems.
>
> Oh, and apparantly it caused the same issue on firefly. I don't really
> see the connection between these two platforms and why it should happen
> just there, though. Any ideas on that part?
Was this fixed somehow? I don't see any more buildfarm failures, but I
didn't see a fix go in either. It is very possible the pgport fix I did
yesterday is related, but I have not applied it yet.
--
Bruce Momjian http://candle.pha.pa.us
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +