Re: Numeric 508 datatype - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: Numeric 508 datatype
Date
Msg-id 200512040114.jB41E9d14738@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Numeric 508 datatype  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Numeric 508 datatype  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > (I could have done the struct but that seemed too invasive.)
>
> I think it'd be a lot cleaner with the struct.  Mind if I take another
> pass at it?

OK, you want my patch or want me to apply and then you can modify?

--
  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us
  pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610) 359-1001
  +  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road
  +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square, Pennsylvania 19073

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Nicolai Tufar
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] snprintf() argument reordering not working under Windows in 8.1
Next
From: Tatsuo Ishii
Date:
Subject: Re: A couple of proposed pgbench changes