Re: per user/database connections limit again - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: per user/database connections limit again
Date
Msg-id 200508011053.52202.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: per user/database connections limit again  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: per user/database connections limit again  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
Am Montag, 25. Juli 2005 18:31 schrieb Tom Lane:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > The new syntax for this command is CREATE/ALTER DATABASE/USER:
> >                 | MAX CONNECTIONS Iconst
> >
> > This adds 'max' as a keyword, though at a fairly unreserved level, I
> > think.  Should we use the syntax LIMIT CONNECTIONS so we don't have to
> > add MAX as a keyword at all?
>
> I didn't like that either.  I was thinking of just CONNECTIONS.
> LIMIT CONNECTIONS sort of works grammatically, I guess.

Would this not work in the context of the general user-specific ALTER USER ...
SET something = something?

--
Peter Eisentraut
http://developer.postgresql.org/~petere/

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] For review: Server instrumentation patch
Next
From: "Dave Page"
Date:
Subject: Win32 Thread Safety