Robert Treat wrote:
> On Thursday 03 March 2005 19:08, Neil Conway wrote:
> > Thomas F.O'Connell wrote:
> > committers, myself included, deserve some blame for not making more
> > rapid progress on the queue of unapplied patches for 8.1. In the
> > meanwhile, the queue should be easier for folks to find (why is the
> > "pgpatches" queue the only one linked from postgresql.org, but it is
> > almost empty?)
> >
>
> Wow, I hadn't realized just how big that queue had gotten. I've got no qualms
> adding another link to the website, but can we get a scheme wrt to links for
> the various patche queues? Is pgpatches for the current stable branch and
> pgpatches2 for the current development branch? (Well, that can't be true
> since before 8.0 release they were both for unstable branches...)
>
> Incidentally, I think DEV_FAQ 1.4 should be modified to include mentioning the
> patch queues.
Done:1.4) What do I do after choosing an item to work on?Send an email to pgsql-hackers with a proposal for what you
wantto do(assuming your contribution is not trivial). Working in isolation is notadvisable: others may be working on
thesame TODO item; you may havemisunderstood the TODO item; your approach may benefit from the reviewof others.A web
siteis maintained for patches that are ready to be applied,http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches, and those
thatarebeing kept for the next release,http://momjian.postgresql.org/cgi-bin/pgpatches2.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
359-1001+ If your life is a hard drive, | 13 Roberts Road + Christ can be your backup. | Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
