Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0 - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0
Date
Msg-id 19405.1122670917@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0  (Andrew McMillan <andrew@catalyst.net.nz>)
Responses Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0  (Matthew Schumacher <matt.s@aptalaska.net>)
List pgsql-performance
Andrew McMillan <andrew@catalyst.net.nz> writes:
> On Fri, 2005-07-29 at 09:37 -0800, Matthew Schumacher wrote:
>> How often should this table be vacuumed, every 5 minutes?

> I would be tempted to vacuum after each e-mail, in this case.

Perhaps the bulk of the transient states should be done in a temp table,
and only write into a real table when you're done?  Dropping a temp
table is way quicker than vacuuming it ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Schumacher
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0
Next
From: Matthew Schumacher
Date:
Subject: Re: Performance problems testing with Spamassassin 3.1.0