Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction
Date
Msg-id 18745.1077604022@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Responses Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
List pgsql-patches
Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> writes:
> I like the idea in general, but maybe instead there should be a new
> overloaded version of the existing function names that accepts an
> additional bool argument. Without the argument, behavior would be as it
> is now; with it, you could specify the old or new behavior.

Um, maybe I'm confused about the context, but aren't we talking about C
function names here?  No overloading is possible in C ...

            regards, tom lane

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction
Next
From: Joe Conway
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] dblink: rollback transaction