Re: more adequate usage msg: pg_controldata.diff - Mailing list pgsql-patches

From Serguei Mokhov
Subject Re: more adequate usage msg: pg_controldata.diff
Date
Msg-id 1042159602.3e1e17f27d4dd@mailhost.cs.concordia.ca
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: more adequate usage msg: pg_controldata.diff  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-patches
[haven't been following the lists for quite some time]

Quoting Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>:

> Actually, it is optional for pg_controldata.  The usage message is
> technically correct as it stands because pg_controldata accepts at most
> one argument (either --help, --version, or a DATADIR name).

         pg_controldata [ DATADIR | options ]

Will the above make more happy people?
Aren't there more serious issues to worry about? ;-)

-s

-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/

pgsql-patches by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: more adequate usage msg: pg_controldata.diff
Next
From: Serguei Mokhov
Date:
Subject: Re: more adequate usage msg: pg_controldata.diff