Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on - Mailing list pgsql-performance

From Bjoern Metzdorf
Subject Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on
Date
Msg-id 012201c2919f$fc4e1b40$0564a8c0@toolteam.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Responses Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no  ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no  ("Josh Berkus" <josh@agliodbs.com>)
Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on  ("scott.marlowe" <scott.marlowe@ihs.com>)
Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no raid on  (Mario Weilguni <mweilguni@sime.com>)
List pgsql-performance
> In fact, the linux kernel supports >2 drives in a mirror.  Useful for a
> mostly read database that needs to handle lots of concurrent users.

Good to know.

What do you think is faster: 3 drives in raid 1 or 3 drives in raid 5?

Regards,
Bjoern


pgsql-performance by date:

Previous
From: Francisco J Reyes
Date:
Subject: ...
Next
From: "Josh Berkus"
Date:
Subject: Re: [ADMIN] H/W RAID 5 on slower disks versus no