Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem? - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Adam Haberlach
Subject Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem?
Date
Msg-id 19990131125103.D22196@ricochet.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Large objects, why not use the filesystem?  (Matthew Hagerty <matthew@wolfepub.com>)
Responses Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem?
List pgsql-interfaces
On Sun, Jan 31, 1999 at 03:26:15PM -0500, Matthew Hagerty wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> I always see posts of people trying to get their large binary and text
> objects into and out of the database somehow.  I was wondering if there is
> some reason why just storing a filename in the table would be a bad thing?
> This way you can let the file system worry about storing the data (since
> that is what the file system is good at.)  I understand that you probably
> could not access the data via ODBC, but if you are writing your frontend in
> C or Perl, etc. then you would simply use the filename stored in the table
> to access the data.

    Because the database is in a different room then the client.


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Matthew Hagerty
Date:
Subject: Large objects, why not use the filesystem?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [INTERFACES] Large objects, why not use the filesystem?