Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Tony Simopoulos
Subject Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Date
Msg-id 020b01c03e96$674d2760$0382a8c0@metavera.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects  (Peter Mount <petermount@maidstone.gov.uk>)
Responses Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
List pgsql-interfaces
sorry,

i must have missed something.  when did outer join's start working?  is there a patch that i can build?

tonys.

> That's a good thought.  It'd be a useful practice to review such
> standard queries from time to time anyway.  For example, now that
> outer joins work, a lot of psql's backslash-command queries could
> be simplified (don't need the UNION ALL WITH SELECT NULL hack).
> 
> Anyone have time to work up a list?
> 
> regards, tom lane



pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: new maintainer for the ODBC driver?
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: RE: JDBC now needs updates for lar ge objects