RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver? - Mailing list pgsql-interfaces

From Hakan Tandogan
Subject RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
Date
Msg-id 00022218230105.10757@taubnessel.pcp.local
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?  (Peter Mount <petermount@it.maidstone.gov.uk>)
List pgsql-interfaces
On Tue, 22 Feb 2000, you wrote:
> The one in CVS is the one that should have been 6.5.3.
> 
> However, I do have at home the one that should be for 7.0. However due
> to problems here (like a network that keeps dying on me, and other nice
> little problems), I've not finished it yet into a state that can be
> included into CVS.
Will those changes be in 7.0 final or is the "feature freeze" already
in effect? If you want, I'd be delighted to test pre-releases of your 7.0
driver.
BTW, did you read my other mail about BINARY field types? Any chance
that 7.0 could help me with that problem? For example, the LO type could be
reported as BINARY...
Regards,    Hakan
-- 
Hakan Tandogan                                       hakan@iconsult.com

ICONSULT Tandogan - Egerer GbR                   Tel.: +49-9131-9047-0
Memelstrasse 38 - D-91052 Erlangen               Fax.: +49-9131-9047-77

"Any sufficiently advanced bug is indistinguishable from a feature"


pgsql-interfaces by date:

Previous
From: Peter Mount
Date:
Subject: RE: [INTERFACES] Last best version of the JDBC Driver?
Next
From: "Ken J. Wright"
Date:
Subject: pg_pwd problem, 2nd try